GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1185MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
+470%
4550
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
+638%
7968
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
+1555%
3676
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
+1872%
1420
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
+563%
146
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1185 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
1920
24
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.88 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
142.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.101 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.550 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
142.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N18E-G1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
