GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1155MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
+642%
5914
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
+602%
7575
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
+1495%
3542
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
+3191%
2370
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
+772%
192
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
40
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.92 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.8 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
11.83 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.914 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
80W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
TU104
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
