Home Comparison GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1125MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB +478%
4608

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
757 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.608 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GA107
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net