GeForce MX250 vs Mobility FireGL V5600
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+564%
797
Mobility FireGL V5600
120
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce MX
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
M76
-
GPU Variant
M76 GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0