CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Comparison
GeForce MX250 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
GeForce MX250 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+83%
797
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
435
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2009
GeForce MX
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.76 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
M96
-
GPU Variant
M96 XT (216-0729051)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
Related CPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
2
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
3
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M
4
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
5
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
6
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350
7
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
8
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R5 A330
9
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165
10
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R7 M270
Related News
1
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
2
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
3
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
4
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
5
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
6
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
7
Intel Unveils Three New Xeon 6 Processors
8
AMD Officially Launches the Zen5 Series Threadripper
9
GIGABYTE Launches AI TOP ATOM Desktop Supercomputer Delivering 1000 TOPS Performance
10
Intel Official Website Unveils Arc B750 Graphics Card
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy