GeForce MX250 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1190MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
Radeon Pro Vega 16
+205%
2437
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
815 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Vega 12
-
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
74 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3