GeForce MX250 vs Radeon Pro W6600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 90W)
Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 96% (2034MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
Radeon Pro W6600M
+814%
7290
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
Radeon Pro W6600M
+559%
7113
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
Radeon Pro W6600M
+1371%
3266
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1224 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
3
SM Count
66
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
28
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
