GeForce MX250 vs Radeon R5 A320
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1038MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+50%
797
Radeon R5 A320
528
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.50 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
528.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Jet
-
GPU Variant
Jet PRO
(216-0856040)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)