GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX 6650M XT
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650M XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 120W)
Radeon RX 6650M XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 133% (2416MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
Radeon RX 6650M XT
+1141%
9896
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
Radeon RX 6650M XT
+756%
9244
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
Radeon RX 6650M XT
+1752%
4113
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
2068 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
2416 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
154.6 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
309.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.79 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.896 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
618.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
120W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Navi 23
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5