GeForce MX250 vs RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1545MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
+1884%
15820
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
+1128%
13251
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
+2859%
6570
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
+5987%
4383
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1110 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
40
384
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
247.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.82 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.82 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
247.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
AD104
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
