GeForce MX250 vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 120W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1680MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+4001%
32690
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
120W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
AD103
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
