GeForce MX550 vs Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX550 and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX550 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1320MHz vs 1300MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX550
2703
Arc Pro A60M
+97%
5325
Blender
GeForce MX550
234
Arc Pro A60M
+388%
1144
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1320 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
21.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
42.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
2.703 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
42.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-256
MX550
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
