GeForce MX550 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX550 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX550 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1320MHz vs 1125MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX550
+17%
2703
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2304
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX550
2375
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+23%
2932
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX550
438
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+200%
1318
Blender
GeForce MX550
234
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
+70%
398
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1320 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
21.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
42.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
2.703 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
42.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
30W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU117
MX550
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
