GeForce RTX 2060 vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060
+219%
6451
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Jan 2019
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 20
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
1440
120
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Cypress
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0