GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (2100MHz vs 1680MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
17536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060
6451
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+1166%
81720
Graphics Card
Jan 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 20
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
19456
120
TMUs
1216
48
ROPs
0
240
Tensor Cores
1216
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
153 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A