GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+8962%
9062
NVS 315
100
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 20
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1605 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
40
SM Count
1
2560
Shading Units
48
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
320
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
283.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
18.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.062 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
283.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
215W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GF119
TU104-410-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
