Home Comparison GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs FirePro 2450 Multi View

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (495.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3032 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER +34743%
11150
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1650 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
495.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
40
192
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
RV620
TU104-450-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net