GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (495.9GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1632 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+453%
11150
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 20
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1650 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
495.9GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1440
192
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
Cypress
TU104-450-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
