GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (495.9GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2856 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+1980%
11150
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
536
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 20
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1650 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
495.9GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
27
3072
Shading Units
216
192
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GT200B
TU104-450-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
