GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (495.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+1455%
11150
Radeon R7 250
717
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
+1971%
11621
Radeon R7 250
561
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 20
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1650 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
495.9GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU104-450-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1