GeForce RTX 2080 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2904 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080
+31368%
10070
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
32
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1515 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
40
184
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
215W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
RV620
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1