GeForce RTX 2080 vs FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (215W vs 300W)
FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080
+26%
10070
FirePro S9300 X2
7987
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1515 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
4096
184
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
215W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
Capsaicin
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0