GeForce RTX 2080 vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080
+1926%
10070
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 20
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1515 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
320
184
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
215W
TDP
105W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
RV670
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1