GeForce RTX 2080 vs Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 215W)
Score
Graphics Card
Sep 2018
Release Date
Jul 2005
GeForce 20
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1515 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
-
184
TMUs
12
64
ROPs
8
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
109.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
314.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
20.14 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
314.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
215W
TDP
83W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
NV41
TU104-400A-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
