GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
+22171%
7127
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
90W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV620
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1