Home Comparison GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs FirePro 2460 Multi View

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +8808%
7127
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Cedar
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net