GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
+8808%
7127
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
90W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
M93
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1