GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs FirePro S9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 225W)
FirePro S9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
+68%
7127
FirePro S9100
4219
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS
Board Design
90W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Hawaii
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3