Home Comparison GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs FireStream 9170

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +1334%
7127
FireStream 9170
497

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 30
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV670
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net