Home Comparison GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1936 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +2549%
7127
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
269

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
28
32
ROPs
20
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
G80
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net