GeForce RTX 3070 vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 3070 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3070
+1931%
20310
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
800
184
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
165.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
317.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
20.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
317.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
220W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
RV770
GA104-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
