GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 3070 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5672 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 220W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3070
+3689%
20310
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
536
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
27
5888
Shading Units
216
184
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
165.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
317.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
20.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
317.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
220W
TDP
171W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
GA104-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
