GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4232 additional rendering cores
FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
+15219%
22060
FireGL V3600
144
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
120
136
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
73W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
RV630
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
