GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 300W)
FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
+176%
22060
FirePro S9300 X2
7987
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
4096
136
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
Capsaicin
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0