GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
+3492%
22060
FirePro V5900
614
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
512
136
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
Cayman
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0