GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs FirePro V8700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
+1738%
22060
FirePro V8700
1200
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
800
136
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
151W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
RV770
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
(215-0669049)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1