GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
+13687%
22060
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
160
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
34
SM Count
8
4352
Shading Units
64
136
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
G92
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
