GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
+4015%
22060
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
536
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
34
SM Count
27
4352
Shading Units
216
136
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
28
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
GT200
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
