Home Comparison GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs Radeon R9 285

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB +570%
22060
Radeon R9 285
3290

Graphics Card

May 2023
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
1792
136
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
Tonga
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net