GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs Radeon X1550 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1550 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 5.280GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Radeon X1550 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 165W)
Score
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
330 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.280GB/s
Render Config
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
-
136
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
27W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
RV505
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
