GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
+4913%
22060
FireGL V8650
440
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
32
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
324.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
R600
AD106-350-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.72 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
