GeForce RTX 4060 vs FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (272.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 115W)
Score
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1830 MHz
Base Clock
-
2460 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2125 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
272.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
118.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
236.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
15.11 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.11 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
236.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV516
AD107-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
