GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
9648 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+60825%
48740
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
80
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
320W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
M93
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1