GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9248 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+7710%
48740
FirePro V3900
624
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
480
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
320W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Turks
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
