GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+7838%
48740
FirePro V5900
614
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
512
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Cayman
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
