Home Comparison GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro V7800

GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
8288 additional rendering cores
FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 +2317%
48740
FirePro V7800
2016

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
1440
304
TMUs
72
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

320W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Cypress
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net