GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro W9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+1120%
48740
FirePro W9000
3994
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
2048
304
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
274W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Tahiti
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1