GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro W9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+830%
48740
FirePro W9100
5238
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce RTX 4080
+693%
28173
FirePro W9100
3552
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
2816
304
TMUs
176
112
ROPs
64
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Hawaii
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
