GeForce RTX 4080 vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
8928 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+3961%
48740
FireStream 9270
1200
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
800
304
TMUs
40
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
160W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
RV770
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1