GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+139157%
48740
GeForce 210 PCI
35
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
2
9728
Shading Units
16
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
320W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT216
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
